How to find the optimal processing order?

StackOverflow https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10879838

質問

I have an interesting question, but I'm not sure exactly how to phrase it...

Consider the lambda calculus. For a given lambda expression, there are several possible reduction orders. But some of these don't terminate, while others do.

In the lambda calculus, it turns out that there is one particular reduction order which is guaranteed to always terminate with an irreducible solution if one actually exists. It's called Normal Order.

I've written a simple logic solver. But the trouble is, the order in which it processes the constraints seems to have a huge effect on whether it finds any solutions or not. Basically, I'm wondering whether something like a normal order exists for my logic programming language. (Or wether it's impossible for a mere machine to deterministically solve this problem.)

So that's what I'm after. Presumably the answer critically depends on exactly what the "simple logic solver" is. So I will attempt to briefly describe it.

My program is closely based on the system of combinators in chapter 9 of The Fun of Programming (Jeremy Gibbons & Oege de Moor). The language has the following structure:

  • The input to the solver is a single predicate. Predicates may involve variables. The output from the solver is zero or more solutions. A solution is a set of variable assignments which make the predicate become true.

  • Variables hold expressions. An expression is an integer, a variable name, or a tuple of subexpressions.

  • There is an equality predicate, which compares expressions (not predicates) for equality. It is satisfied if substituting every (bound) variable with its value makes the two expressions identical. (In particular, every variable equals itself, bound or not.) This predicate is solved using unification.

  • There are also operators for AND and OR, which work in the obvious way. There is no NOT operator.

  • There is an "exists" operator, which essentially creates local variables.

  • The facility to define named predicates enables recursive looping.

One of the "interesting things" about logic programming is that once you write a named predicate, it typically works fowards and backwards (and sometimes even sideways). Canonical example: A predicate to concatinate two lists can also be used to split a list into all possible pairs.

But sometimes running a predicate backwards results in an infinite search, unless you rearrange the order of the terms. (E.g., swap the LHS and RHS of an AND or an OR somehwere.) I'm wondering whether there's some automated way to detect the best order to run the predicates in, to ensure prompt termination in all cases where the solution set is exactually finite.

Any suggestions?

ライセンス： CC-BY-SA と 帰属
所属していません StackOverflow
scroll top