Why did Windows NT move away from the microkernel? [closed]

Question

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.

---

We don’t allow questions about general computing hardware and software on Stack Overflow. You can edit the question so it’s on-topic for Stack Overflow.

Closed 8 years ago.

Improve this question

I'm told, that Windows NT was first designed to implement the microkernel architecture, but moved away to hybrid kernel.

What caused the change? I'm having trouble trying to find any info about this.

Answer 1

The main reason that Windows NT became a hybrid kernel is speed. A microkernel-based system puts only the bare minimum system components in the kernel and runs the rest of them as user mode processes, known as servers. A form of inter-process communication (IPC), usually message passing, is used for communication between servers and the kernel.

Microkernel-based systems are more stable than others; if a server crashes, it can be restarted without affecting the entire system, which couldn't be done if every system component was part of the kernel. However, because of the overhead incurred by IPC and context-switching, microkernels are slower than traditional kernels. Due to the performance costs of a microkernel, Microsoft decided to keep the structure of a microkernel, but run the system components in kernel space. Starting in Windows Vista, some drivers are also run in user mode.