How to make inline taglets (which require com.sun) more cross-platform? Is there a non-Oracle/more-cross-platform javadoc parser?

StackOverflow https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23138806

문제

I'm writing a library that inserts already unit-tested example code (its source-code, output, and any input files) into JavaDoc, with lots of customization possibilities. The main way of using this library is with inline taglets, such as

{@.codelet.and.out my.package.AGreatExample}
{@.codelet my.package.AGreatExample}
{@.file.textlet examples\doc-files\an_input_file.txt}
{@.codelet.and.out my.package.AGreatExample%eliminateCommentBlocksAndPackageDecl()}

Since custom taglets (and even doclets) require com.sun, this means they're not nearly as cross platform as Java itself. (Not sure if this is relevant, but the word "javadoc"--and even the substring "doc"--is not in the Java 8 Language Specifications.)

I don't like the idea of writing a library that's limited in this way. So what do I do? My thoughts so far are that

  • In order to take advantage of the existing javadoc parser, I stick with the com.sun taglets. However, I make this reliance on com.sun as "thin" as can be. That is, I put as little code in the taglet class as possible, leaving the bulk of the code elsewhere, where there is no reliance on com.sun.
  • I work towards creating my own parser, which only searches for my specific taglets. This is a pain, but not too horrible. You iterate through the lines of each Java source file, searching for \{@\.myTagletName (.*?)\}. Once you capture that text, it's pretty much the same as the code within the com.sun taglet.
  • This parser would have to be run before executing javadoc, and would therefore require a duplicate directory structure. (1) your original code, with the unparsed custom tags, (2) the duplicate of that code, with parsed-output. I'd copy all code to the duplicate directory, and then parse only those Java files known to have these taglets (classes that are "registered" in some way with the parser).

Is this a reasonable approach? Is there a more cross-platform javadoc/taglet parser out there already, so I don't have to roll my own? Is there anything cross-platform that is taglet-like already out there? Is JavaDoc itself not cross platform, or just custom taglets and doclets?

I'd like a rough perspective on how many people I'm locking out of my library because of this decision (to use inline taglets), but mostly I'm looking for a long term solution.

(Despite my Java 8 link above, I'm using Java 7.)


Credit to @fge for the taglet suggestion, which is more elegant than my original idea, and to @Michael for the ominous-but-helpful com.sun warnings.

도움이 되었습니까?

해결책

At first, note that there is a difference between sun.* and com.sun.* dependencies. The sun.* namespace contains classes that implement Oracle's Java Virtual Machine. You should not use such dependencies because the Oracle JVM's internal API can change in future releases and because this namespace may not be provided by other, non-Oracle JVM implementations. (In practice, even Android's JVM ships with one of the more widely used sun.* classes.)

Then there is the com.sun.* namespace which was used by Sun Microsystems for implementing its Java applications. An example for legal use of com.sun.* dependencies is Sun's Jersey framework which was originally deployed in the com.sun.jersey.* namespace. (For the sake of completeness, note that recent Jersey versions are deployed in the org.glassfish.jersey.* namespace beginning with version 2.0 which is incompatible to the Jersey 1 API.) For further reference, note how Oracle does not even mention the com.sun.* namespace when discussing the problems that are imposed by using the sun.* namespace. Also, see this related question on Stack Overflow.

Therefore, using com.sun.* dependencies is a different deal compared to sun.* dependencies. By using com.sun.* classes, you rather lock yourself to a specific library's API, not to a specific JVM. For example, you can avoid direct use of the com.sun.jersey.* namespace by using the standardized JAX-RS javax.ws.rs.* namespace. In this sense, com.sun.* dependencies are product specific and proprietary and must not be confused with Java's standardized APIs which are usually found in the javax.* namespace.

If I was you, I would stick with the taglets which is a mature and recognized implementation. Oracle is pretty determined not to break APIs (otherwise, they would probably also move the taglets to com.oracle.*) and I see no reason why they would suddenly change the taglet package structure. And if they would, you merely need to update your tech. If your application breaks for a new Java release, your users will come looking for an update of your software. Because you do not run the taglet project, I agree with you that detaching your logic from a foreign API is in general a good idea as it is for any dependency. Also, using taglets for your use case pretty much recognizes the KISS and DRY principles.

라이센스 : CC-BY-SA ~와 함께 속성
제휴하지 않습니다 StackOverflow
scroll top