Pergunta

According to http://emberjs.com/guides/object-model/classes-and-instances/ it is required to access properties using getters and setters:

When accessing the properties of an object, use the get and set accessor methods.

Make sure to use these accessor methods; otherwise, computed properties won't recalculate, observers won't fire, and templates won't update.

I understand that it is needed to use setters when changing property to let Ember know about the change so it can update bindings, but what about reading properties?

Example from http://emberjs.com/guides/object-model/classes-and-instances/

App.Person = Ember.Object.extend({
  say: function(thing) {
    var name = this.get('name');
    alert(name + " says: " + thing);
  }
});

var yehuda = App.Person.create({
  name: "Yehuda Katz"
});

yehuda.say("Yes");

In the example above, this.get('name') is used to access property name, however method say is defined as a property of class App.Person and is accessed directly by dot notation. While there is a distinctive usage difference between method and property, in JavaScript, there's no difference in implementation of both. The example still works if I replace this.get('name') by this.name.

  1. Are there any implementation differences in Ember regarding methods and properties of object?
  2. Is it always safe to access methods directly?
  3. Must all properties including computed properties be always accessed by getter? If not, when is it safe to access properties directly?

I definitely want to stick to best practise here, which is to use getter/setter every time, but I'd like to understand the internals of Ember.js :)

Foi útil?

Solução

  1. The definition of a method or a property in Ember is the same as in Vanilla JavaScript, but they are resolved different in Ember. You are not working with POJOs. Every time you extend from a Route/Controller/View, you are adding the Ember layer that processes methods and properties differently.
  2. No, is not always safe. In your case it is because it is overly simple.
  3. Yes, always access properties with get.

User interaction with your app is what causes changes in the properties of your objects, we handle those interactions with events. When an event in Ember is fired, it is not resolved immediately, instead it is put in a priority queue and resolved at a later time.

Properties are updated and read in an asynchronous form, if you access them directly using this there is no guarantee that you'll get the most up to date value.

Check: Managing Asynchrony

When you make a change to a property in Ember, it does not immediately propagate that change. Instead, it invalidates any dependent properties immediately, but queues the actual change to happen later.

So, when you change the value of a property, this is roughly what happens:

  1. A property is changed
  2. All dependent properties are invalidated
  3. Queues the actual change for later
  4. Wait for any other event handlers, for the current user, to finish
  5. Flush the changes queue
    • Until here, the property is actually updated (and this would work as usual)

Imagine you use this to read a property, but some other event occurs that changes its value. The new value won't be available until the queue is flushed, but this reads immediately the property and returns the value of a property that is scheduled to be updated soon. You get stale data. The methods get and set manage this asynchrony for you and guarantee fresh values always.

When you have only one property, in the whole app, this asynchronous mechanism won't be noticed.

There are many different queues in Ember, and the fundamental mechanism behind all this is the run loop.

Licenciado em: CC-BY-SA com atribuição
Não afiliado a StackOverflow
scroll top