Вопрос

This code seems to work as expected, populates an array of numbers using a single pointer

#include <stdio.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int main(void)
{
    int arr[4], count = 0, i;
    char *p, s[32] = "  \t  10,  15  \n  ,20,   25  , ";

    p = s;
    do {
        arr[count++] = (int)strtol(p, &p, 10);
        while (isspace(*p) || *p == ',') p++;
    } while (*p);
    for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
        printf("%d\n", arr[i]);
    }
    return 0;
}

My question is:

It is valid to use p as param1 (source) and &p as param 2 (address of the first invalid character) in strtol?

Это было полезно?

Решение 2

Yes it is safe.

Please refer to http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/string/byte/strtol for complete usage reference. Line 11 of the example illustrates a call using the same variable for the 1st and 2nd parameters.

Другие советы

Yes, it is safe. The first argument is passed by value, so strtol has a local copy that isn't affected by changes written to the second parameter.

Yes, this is valid, as you are keeping the pointer to the beginning of the string (pointer s). Consider that you have this situation:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

int main(void)
{
    int arr[4], count = 0, i;
    char *p, *s;
    s = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char) * 15);
    strcpy(s, "  \t  10,  15  \n  ,20,   25  , ");

    p = s;
    do {
        arr[count++] = (int)strtol(p, &p, 10);
        while (isspace(*p) || *p == ',') p++;
    } while (*p);
    for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
        printf("%d\n", arr[i]);
    }
    free(s);
    return 0;
}

strtol will move p pointer to somewhere in string. If you call free(p) you will have memory leak (if it doesn't fail). But, since you are keeping s pointer, you will always be able to free the occupied memory.

Лицензировано под: CC-BY-SA с атрибуция
Не связан с StackOverflow
scroll top