Pregunta

SharePoint 2013 admite un nuevo tipo de soluciones llamadas APPS.SEACIONES A MSDN, las aplicaciones son una pieza de funcionalidad independientes y fácil de instalar, usar y actualizar.

Creo que SharePoint Features también admite una instalación y actualización fáciles.Una característica puede contener funcionalidad autocontrol como la parte web o el trabajo del temporizador.

Entonces, ¿cuál es la diferencia entre aplicaciones y características o las soluciones tradicionales (granja o caja de arena)

¿Fue útil?

Solución

In an app:

  • all the SharePoint artifacts you create (lists, pages, files) are located in a special sub site only for that app.
  • all the code runs outside the SharePoint servers, can be client site, other servers or Azure
  • for the code to access items in the original site/site collection, the app have to specify that in it's manifest and the installing user has to have these permissions and pass them to the app
  • one app has absolutely no access to the data of another app

So the advantages for apps are:

  • They are really separate from the site where they are installed which makes it easy to uninstall (can remove everything)
  • Can't affect perfomance of SharePoint servers
  • Can do more than you could in Sandboxed solutions

The disadvantage for apps are:

  • Completely new development model, which at least in the beginning will be a lot harder.
  • No way to combine apps to work together

Otros consejos

This article on MSDN goes into detail, but sums it up succinctly as : "Apps are for end users and farm solutions are for administrators." Sandbox solutions are deprecated with 2013, and generally the sort of thing that you would have previously used a Sandbox solution for should now be an app.

Licenciado bajo: CC-BY-SA con atribución
scroll top