Domanda

SharePoint 2013 supporta il nuovo tipo di soluzioni chiamate apps.Accordrendo a MSDN, le app sono un pezzo di funzionalità autonomo e facile da installare, utilizzare e aggiornare.

Penso che le funzioni SharePoint supportano anche una facile installazione e aggiornamento.Una funzionalità può contenere funzionalità autonome come Web parte o lavoro timer.

Allora, qual è la differenza tra app e funzionalità o soluzioni tradizionali (farm o sandbox)

È stato utile?

Soluzione

In an app:

  • all the SharePoint artifacts you create (lists, pages, files) are located in a special sub site only for that app.
  • all the code runs outside the SharePoint servers, can be client site, other servers or Azure
  • for the code to access items in the original site/site collection, the app have to specify that in it's manifest and the installing user has to have these permissions and pass them to the app
  • one app has absolutely no access to the data of another app

So the advantages for apps are:

  • They are really separate from the site where they are installed which makes it easy to uninstall (can remove everything)
  • Can't affect perfomance of SharePoint servers
  • Can do more than you could in Sandboxed solutions

The disadvantage for apps are:

  • Completely new development model, which at least in the beginning will be a lot harder.
  • No way to combine apps to work together

Altri suggerimenti

This article on MSDN goes into detail, but sums it up succinctly as : "Apps are for end users and farm solutions are for administrators." Sandbox solutions are deprecated with 2013, and generally the sort of thing that you would have previously used a Sandbox solution for should now be an app.

Autorizzato sotto: CC-BY-SA insieme a attribuzione
Non affiliato a sharepoint.stackexchange
scroll top