Pergunta

SharePoint 2013 suporta novo tipo de soluções chamadas aplicativos. Acordando para MSDN, os aplicativos são auto-contidos peça de funcionalidade e fácil de instalar, usar e atualizar.

Eu acho que os recursos do SharePoint também suportam fácil instalação e atualização.Um recurso pode conter funcionalidade autônoma como trabalho da Web ou Timer.

Então, qual é a diferença entre aplicativos e recursos ou soluções tradicionais (farm ou sandbox)

Foi útil?

Solução

In an app:

  • all the SharePoint artifacts you create (lists, pages, files) are located in a special sub site only for that app.
  • all the code runs outside the SharePoint servers, can be client site, other servers or Azure
  • for the code to access items in the original site/site collection, the app have to specify that in it's manifest and the installing user has to have these permissions and pass them to the app
  • one app has absolutely no access to the data of another app

So the advantages for apps are:

  • They are really separate from the site where they are installed which makes it easy to uninstall (can remove everything)
  • Can't affect perfomance of SharePoint servers
  • Can do more than you could in Sandboxed solutions

The disadvantage for apps are:

  • Completely new development model, which at least in the beginning will be a lot harder.
  • No way to combine apps to work together

Outras dicas

This article on MSDN goes into detail, but sums it up succinctly as : "Apps are for end users and farm solutions are for administrators." Sandbox solutions are deprecated with 2013, and generally the sort of thing that you would have previously used a Sandbox solution for should now be an app.

Licenciado em: CC-BY-SA com atribuição
Não afiliado a sharepoint.stackexchange
scroll top