문제

An attempt to capture notable differences between implementations:

  1. Adobe ColdFusion
  2. Railo
  3. Open Bluedragon

(I'm aware of Smith, but don't believe it's still active).

Include CFML and platform differences - syntax, feature, and extensibility.

Note, this is not something I've not seen anywhere else, but maybe I'm just not searching correctly. So links to that end would count too.

Update

Here's my definition of notable in this context: something that simplifies solving a difficult problem. For example, Railo offers the <cfvideo> tag, which transcodes video - a non trivial task.

Something I would suggest is not notable: the Railo function ListAvg().

도움이 되었습니까?

해결책

Marking as a community wiki.

Overview

Aggregation of items I've called "notable":

Open Bluedragon

  1. Web based line debugger: Adobe Eclipse based is finicky.
  2. Memcached intregration: Adobe ehcache solution works well, but memcached still appears to have better failover and sharding. In fact, sharding appears to only be available in Adobe with Terracotta or rolling your own.
  3. Runs on Google App Engine

Railo

  1. <cfvideo>: video transcoding, pay feature, but low cost, free option is ffmpeg, but that has legal question marks
  2. cluster scope: interesting way of solving messaging between servers, pay feature.

다른 팁

The closest you're going to get to a complete answer will be: http://cfml-engines.info/, which is a work in progress and doesn't have all of the information you're looking for. It's just too open-ended of a question.

You don't need to search A LOT. Both "alternative" engines have official wikis with articles specifically describing the compatibility questions:

Another place to look for the latest details on OpenBD: http://www.openbluedragon.org/manual

That documentation is pulled straight from the codebase so it's always up to date. (This is another way of saying the OpenBD wiki may not necessarily be the latest and greatest.)

라이센스 : CC-BY-SA ~와 함께 속성
제휴하지 않습니다 StackOverflow
scroll top