What is the difference between cyber security ontologies and scenario ontologies in this system?

Question

I have been reading the paper Towards a Cognitive System for Decision Support in Cyber Operations. And I have been trying to understand the role of two ontologies proposed here, cyber security ontologies and scenario ontologies.

I have asked a question on CGS SE, What are the practical uses of ontologies? and the role of the ACT-R architecture in this system have become clear to some extent, but the question about the ontologies is that:

Does the cyber security ontologies make the ideas in the TENA's Repo understandable for ACT-R or the ideas that are in the repo has to be represented by an ontology called cyber security ontologies in order to be understandable for the ACT-R architecture?

The Cognitive System realized in the TENA framework:

Questions raising from this Figure can be:

1. What is the difference between the cyber security ontologies and the scenario ontologies?
2. What kind of knowledge the scenario ontologies represent?
3. And of course what is the reason that the scenario ontologies are connected to Event data management module instead of TENA's Repo?

ACT-R Architecture:

TENA Architecture: